Day one ready
Generic Professional Capabilities 2017 (GMC)
Capabilities in research and scholarship
GPC domain 9 — appraising evidence, understanding research governance, and applying findings to a patient.
Why this matters on day one
The clinically useful skill is not conducting research but reading it: knowing whether a paper should change your practice, and being able to explain a risk to a patient in numbers they can use.
What the domain requires
- 1Appraise critically. Study design and its hierarchy, bias, confounding, sample size, and whether the outcome measured is the one that matters to patients.
- 2Interpret the numbers. Absolute versus relative risk, number needed to treat, confidence intervals, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values — and how prevalence changes the last of these.
- 3Understand governance. Research ethics approval, informed consent for research, GDPR and data handling, and the difference between research, audit and service evaluation.
- 4Apply it. Translate evidence to the individual in front of you, including when the trial population does not resemble them.
What evidencing it looks like
- A critical appraisal, ideally presented at a journal club.
- Participation in a research project or service evaluation, with your specific contribution stated.
- Good Clinical Practice training where relevant.
What falls short
- Quoting relative risk reduction to a patient, which systematically overstates benefit.
- Treating a surrogate outcome as though it were a clinical one.
- Confusing audit with research and taking the wrong approvals route.
Demonstrated by
GMC Generic professional capabilities framework (2017), domain 9